<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Right Press... &#187; Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/category/constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com</link>
	<description>Brought to you by American Political Analysis Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 05:50:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Never Ending Story…</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/01/the-never-ending-story%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/01/the-never-ending-story%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack H. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No we’re not talking about the Sci-Fi fantasy motion picture; we’re talking about President Obama’s recent executive order granting Interpol full diplomatic immunity from American law. The Obama administration still has not publically commented on the order. However Interpol’s Secretary General, Ron Noble has issued an after-the fact-response to the order even though Interpol has not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/01/the-never-ending-story%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paradox of International Law&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/01/paradox-of-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/01/paradox-of-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack H. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civilian National Security Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTERPOL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama&#8217;s recent executive order involving INTERPOL and his visit to the ‘Copenhagen’ climate summit have sparked increasing interest into the ideas of internalnational law and how it can apply to the United States; more specifically how the Obama administration envisions how it can apply to the United States. Some critiques on the left would have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/01/paradox-of-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>INTERPOL Immunity, and more Global Governance?</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/01/interpol-immunity-and-more-global-governance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/01/interpol-immunity-and-more-global-governance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 01:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack H. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTERPOL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many speculations regarding President Obama&#8217;s secretive Executive Order 12425 that was made in the middle of the night on December 17, which grants full immunity to INTERPOL (the International Police Organization) on American soil. The order basically grants the foreign law enforcement agency some very broad powers to operate nearly unrestricted within the United States; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/01/interpol-immunity-and-more-global-governance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America, the land of dependency&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/11/america-the-land-of-dependency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/11/america-the-land-of-dependency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack H. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“I’m from the government and I’m here to help you.” This phrase is more applicable now than ever. For months now Americans have been telling and often shouting what they want and don’t want to their elected representatives with little results. House and Senate Democrats have continued to tell the American public that they know what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/11/america-the-land-of-dependency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: He’s not eligible!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/10/obama-he%e2%80%99s-not-eligible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/10/obama-he%e2%80%99s-not-eligible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack H. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ineligibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, I admit I just used that title to pull you into reading this. Apparently it worked if you’ve read this far. If you have a computer and an internet connection, then you’ve probably read or heard about the many looming court cases and questions regarding Obama’s eligibility for President of the United States. Many [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/10/obama-he%e2%80%99s-not-eligible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citizen Disarmament?</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/10/citizen-disarmament/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/10/citizen-disarmament/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again the talk about gun rights is heating up, mostly due to Bobby Rush’s (D) H.R. 45 Blair Holt&#8217;s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 and the Obama administration’s appointment of anti-gun advocate Judge Sotomayor to the Supreme Court. The Act is much more than a forced registration of all firearms [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/10/citizen-disarmament/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Second Amendment &#8211; Protecting All Other Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/09/the-second-amendment-protecting-all-other-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/09/the-second-amendment-protecting-all-other-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joy Burgess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Rush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR-45]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gun rights. It&#8217;s an issue that comes up in just about any election, from congressional elections, to gubernatorial elections, to Presidential elections. For conservatives, the Second Amendment is part of the conservative creed. When you take a closer look at gun rights and the Second Amendment, in reality this is the way that the rest [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/09/the-second-amendment-protecting-all-other-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green-Cycling America</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/09/de-cycling-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/09/de-cycling-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CZAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years America has been bombarded with environmental activism, with little affect on the lives of everyday citizens. Well I’m afraid those days are long gone, and have been ever since Al Gore started to push his Global Warming ideologies and agenda onto the public and private sectors of American society. As annoying as the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/09/de-cycling-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civilian National Security Force; fact or fiction?</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/08/civilian-national-security-force-fact-or-fiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/08/civilian-national-security-force-fact-or-fiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmeriCorps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civilian National Security Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanpoliticalanalysis.wordpress.com/?p=283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently Glen Beck did a compelling and informative TV show about Obama’s campaign idea regarding a Civilian National Security force…Glen pointed out that it looks like it may in fact be slowly forming under the guise of groups like STORM, AmeriCorps, ACORN and the like. Many of these groups have received hundreds of millions of dollars in government funding (tax payers money) and are sharing top leaders within their respective organizations...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/08/civilian-national-security-force-fact-or-fiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President for Life?</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/07/h-j-res-5-president-for-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/07/h-j-res-5-president-for-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack H. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanpoliticalanalysis.wordpress.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine an America where we had the same President over and over, term after term. Sounds like a bad idea right? Well in early January of 2009 Rep. José Serrano, a New York Democrat, had proposed a congressional House resolution to make an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/07/h-j-res-5-president-for-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Separation of church and state”</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/02/%e2%80%9cseparation-of-church-and-state%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/02/%e2%80%9cseparation-of-church-and-state%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanpoliticalanalysis.wordpress.com/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Keith Sipmann Freedom of religion and the first amendment have been a hot topic for some time now. However many people may have misunderstood what the wording means. The wording of the Bill of Rights is not ambiguous, yet many people who want to expand government power have chipped away and attempted to modify [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/02/%e2%80%9cseparation-of-church-and-state%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gun Rights (2nd Amendment)</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/02/gun-rights-2nd-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/02/gun-rights-2nd-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://americanpoliticalanalysis.wordpress.com/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Keith Sipmann Some historians and political figures would argue that the intention of the 2nd Amendment was not to protect an individual’s right to own guns, or to provide the people with the means to defend themselves from their own government should there ever be a need to do so. The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which is part of the United States Bill [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2009/02/gun-rights-2nd-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
