<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Right Press...</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com</link>
	<description>Brought to you by the American Political Analysis Association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:36:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Potemkin War</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/03/the-potemkin-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/03/the-potemkin-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Yost</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competitiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. does not economically “compete” with other nations
On February 24th, Barack Obama appeared before the Business Roundtable, an association of corporate CEO’s, to give an address on what has now become a major talking point of his administration: competitiveness.  In the President’s view, the main problem that the U.S. is facing is that other [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/03/the-potemkin-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Democrats: Move On</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/03/to-democrats-move-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/03/to-democrats-move-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Yost</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reconciliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the recent Health Care Summit accomplished anything, it was to demonstrate two facts: Republicans have their own ideas, and these ideas are fundamentally different from those of the Democrats. After having spent months talking up the notion that no right-wing alternatives exist on health care, Democrats seemed genuinely surprised to find their rivals armed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/03/to-democrats-move-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Parties = Sour Taste For Some</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/03/tea-parties-sour-taste-for-some/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/03/tea-parties-sour-taste-for-some/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since last years tax-day tea party revolt, there have been countless Tea Party groups springing up all over the nation. Each group is a grassroots movement unto itself, with its own loosely based leadership, values, motives and purpose. In the beginning the platform was simple &#8211; anti-tax and anti-big government. The tea flavor was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/03/tea-parties-sour-taste-for-some/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public option? How about a private option?</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/public-option-how-about-a-private-option/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/public-option-how-about-a-private-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Yost</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school vouchers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Democrats’ new-found love of competition should be applied to education reform
As the national health care debate again rears its ugly head (so much for focusing on the economy), Democrats have begun murmuring that now is the time to put the so-called “public option” back on the table.  To hear liberals talk about it, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/public-option-how-about-a-private-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party Coalition?</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/tea-party-coalition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/tea-party-coalition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lately there has been some talk about the various Tea Party groups unifying under one &#8220;umbrella&#8221;. Do you think this would be a good or bad idea? Please use the poll below to answer and also feel free to expand on your reasoning in the comment section.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/tea-party-coalition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citizen Legislators, Not Career Politicians</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/citizen-legislators-not-career-politicians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/citizen-legislators-not-career-politicians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Career Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Reagan once said, “One thing our founding fathers could not foresee…was a nation governed by professional politicians who had a vested interest in getting reelected. They probably envisioned a fellow serving a couple of hitches and then looking…forward to getting back to the farm.”
There has been much talk within the Conservative, Libertarian and Tea [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/citizen-legislators-not-career-politicians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona Gubernatorial Election: Hugh Kealer</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/arizona-get-to-know-hugh-kealer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/arizona-get-to-know-hugh-kealer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you live in Arizona, you probably know that there are a few candidates running in the Arizona Gubernatorial race. Many are people that have already served in an Arizona public seat, such as the incumbent Gov. Jan Brewer (R), Arizona State Treasurer Dean Martin (R) or Attorney General Terry Goddard (D). However there are other candidates [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/arizona-get-to-know-hugh-kealer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bomb &#8216;em</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/bomb-em/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/bomb-em/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Yost</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Non-Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear proliferation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US has a rare window of opportunity to make productive air strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities.

It shouldn’t be necessary at this point, but given the pockets of feigned disbelief that remain abroad, it deserves repeating: The Iranians are developing nuclear weapons. Rhetorically, they continue to maintain the pretense of pursuing peaceful nuclear power, but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/bomb-em/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will they ever learn?</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/will-they-ever-learn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/will-they-ever-learn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since Sarah Palin entered the national political scene she has been criticized, critiqued, mocked and bashed arguably more-so than any other candidate in recent memory (aside from post election President Obama). Most politicians would have cracked under the pressure and faded away into the night quietly. Why can&#8217;t the Left understand that they make her [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/will-they-ever-learn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona: Alternative Budget, or just tax hikes?</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/alternative-budget-or-just-tax-increases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/alternative-budget-or-just-tax-increases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An alternative budget has been introduced in the state legislature with fewer program cuts than leadership’s budget, of course they accomplish that by raising your taxes. Representatives Chad Campbell and Bill Konopnicki discussed the alternative budget on PBS&#8230;watch the video and post your comments below.

Watch the Video here.
Journalists Roundtable follow-up: Watch the Video here. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/alternative-budget-or-just-tax-increases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Senate, Arizona: Poll</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/us-senate-arizona-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/us-senate-arizona-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Simcox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JD Hayworth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Deakin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arizona is going to have an exciting political year. We have four Republicans running for the US Senate seat. Each candidate is different and represents different parts of the Republican Party. Chris Simcox,  Jim Deakin, JD Hayworth and John McCain are all campaigning for the spot that Sen. John McCain currently holds.


We are in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/us-senate-arizona-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Equivocator and Chief…</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/equivocator-and-chief%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/equivocator-and-chief%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack H. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOTU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the beginning of 2009 most of the main stream media couldn’t get enough of President Obama. They covered him 24/7, showering him with praise and commenting on how well he spoke to the people and to the press. Very little effort was given at dissecting what he said; instead the media focused on how [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/02/equivocator-and-chief%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Junk Science =“Good Enough” Science&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/01/junk-science-%e2%80%9cgood-enough%e2%80%9d-science-for-libs%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/01/junk-science-%e2%80%9cgood-enough%e2%80%9d-science-for-libs%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sipmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack H. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/?p=1192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever wondered how far Enviro-Libs would take their political or social agendas? With the news of the recent climate research unit hacking at the University of East Anglia, also commonly known as “Climate-Gate”, and with the constant flow of information showing us that global warming is a fraud or hoax based on cooked figures and data; it’s astonishing that the main stream media outlets have not reported the true findings to expose the hoax for what it is. Green advocates are supposed to be for a clean environment, so why do they peddle this garbage agenda onto everyone?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanpoliticalanalysis.com/2010/01/junk-science-%e2%80%9cgood-enough%e2%80%9d-science-for-libs%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
